Skip to content

The many dimensions of data

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Do you feel safe walking around after dark? Does the size of the city affect how you feel? How do these feelings compare between men and women? For data analysts, these questions come with unwieldy amounts of data. Luckily, Dr Gianmarco Alberti from the Department of Criminology (Faculty of Social Wellbeing, University of Malta) has authored a free software that visually portrays data patterns in a practical way.

So how does the software work? Going back to our safety in the dark example, the data is plugged into the software. The programme then explores how the feeling of safety relates to the size of the city. In this example, we’ll split the variable ‘feeling safe after dark’ by gender and see if it’s influenced by the number of people living in the city  (‘town size’, represented at the top of the first image). The table below is small yet highly complex (see figure 1), finding any obvious pattern of association between categories is hardly an easy task.  

Table 1: presents how safe male and female participants feel after dark (column 1) compared to the population size of the city (row 1) 

Plugging this data into Alberti’s software, named ‘CAinterprTools’, provides a body of facilities that allow users to get the most of those results (see figure 2). With this image, it’s easier to understand that the bigger the town (right side along the horizontal axis), the less safe interviewees felt. Both male (identified with a M) and female (identified with a F) have the same perception of their safety in a smaller town (points in the left-hand side of the chart). However, as the size of the town increases, females start to feel less secure than men (points to the right-hand side of the chart). It is clear that this approach can provide insights into data structure and help reveal hidden patterns. 

Figure 2: shows a visual representation of the data presented in Table 1. The size of the city is marked with black points, while how safe participants felt is symbolised by the red triangles. 

The beauty of Alberti’s program is that it increases data analysis efficiency, not only to researchers (e.g criminologists, political scientists, or biologists) but also to citizens and several entities that work with data (e.g. banks, customers, or companies).  The fact that this software was developed under the free R statistical programming language means it is a free resource which can allow for an easier way to interpret data — especially for those who aren’t math oriented! Let’s hope this leads to safer streets for all!

The programme can be found on https://cran.r-project.org/package=CAinterprTools.

The data used in the table was taken from the International Crime Victim Survey – https://wp.unil.ch/icvs/

Author

More to Explore

Reproducibility in Science – Why It Matters More Than Ever

Have you ever scrolled past a viral claim online and thought, ‘That sounds true’? Maybe it was a headline about a miracle cure or a diet hack. Or noticed how quickly new ideas spread online – sometimes before anyone has checked if they’re real? From scientific labs to TikTok feeds, we’re constantly asked to decide: What is true? And more often than not, the answer lies in one underappreciated scientific principle – reproducibility.

A Pocket Guide on Dumplings

Who doesn’t love a tight, little meat package? Before the prudes boo me off stage, I’m talking about dumplings. These delectable morsels are found all over the world. In fact, it could be argued that every country or region has their own type of dumpling. Because, when you get down to eat, few things can match that universal, carnal appeal of a mouthful of warm, juicy meat (okay, that was the last one, I promise). While this is by no means an exhaustive list, we’ve selected six scrumptious dumplings to whet your appetite!

Life Against Entropy

Most of us move through life with a quiet certainty that being alive is self-evident. We grow, think, love, worry, plan. We distinguish instinctively between what lives and what does not. A person is alive; a stone is not. A dog is alive; a machine is not. The line feels obvious, until someone asks us to explain it.

Comments are closed for this article!