Skip to content

(Re)diffusion

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn

As part of his Ph.D. at the Faculty of Media and Knowledge Sciences, Department of Digital Arts (University of Malta), Matthew Galea has developed an interactive sound art piece entitled (Re)diffusion.

(Re)diffusion comes from Weapons of Mass Distraction, a series Galea has been working on which draws analogies between agents of mass communication and firearms. In language, terms like ‘point’ and ‘shoot’ are shared between the two devices, illustrating how both can be used for a positive or negative effect. ‘Mass communication has been weaponised in some cases and can perhaps cause more harm than firearms,’ Galea says.

Galea believes that sculpture is an intervention in society rather than matter, and that it makes use of space as an agent that connects everything: objects, sounds, and time. However, sound has long been ignored in the medium. As Marshall McLuhan remarked, no object can be considered as purely visual, sonic, or tactile, but rather a blend of sensory stimuli. This idea of sensory ratios applies to how media comes into being.

‘I believe that sculpture can go beyond simply being looked at’

Objects moving in space or triggered on a computer, always require some kind of physical intervention that comes with visual and other sensory consequences. Similarly, sound does not exist in isolation. Sound always requires some kind of physical media to propagate it. Galea notes that whilst the human characteristic of observing things in isolation is beneficial in some areas, in an artistic context is rather pointless. In (Re)Diffusion, he attempts to create a sculptural situation that has the ability to distort space and modify it in real time. ‘I believe that sculpture can go beyond simply being looked at,’ Galea says. 


(Re)Diffusion will be part of IN TRANSIT, an exhibition curated by Prof. Vince Briffa, which showcases the works of emerging Maltese artists that work with digital media. The exhibition will travel to Dusseldorf (Germany) and Leeuwarden (Netherlands).

More to Explore

Adrift at Sea: Laws, Morals, and Policies in Malta’s Search and Rescue Region

Since 2016, EU member states have scaled down search and rescue operations that save lives at sea and replaced them with policies intended to reduce the number of migrant arrivals to Europe. These policies of non-assistance and forced returns to Libya render the central Mediterranean one of the world’s deadliest border spaces and force asylum seekers back to a war zone where inhuman and degrading treatment is well-documented. A growing network of civil society organisations continues to challenge these policies in the courts, on the streets, and at sea. This article, the second in a two-part series on migration, is based in part on interviews conducted with Dr Omar Grech, Senior Lecturer in International Law at the University of Malta (UM), Dr Derek Lutterbeck, Deputy Director at the Mediterranean Academy of Diplomatic Studies at UM, and Dr Felicity Attard, expert in International and Maritime Security Law at the Faculty of Laws at UM.

Concentration Camps in Libya

Following the NATO-backed overthrow of Muammar Gaddafi in 2011, Libya descended into a decade of disunity and violence resulting in incalculable suffering and loss of life. Today, much of the country remains a war zone, and migrants in EU-sponsored Libyan detention facilities continue to suffer well-documented, gross human rights violations. This article, the first in a two-part series on migration, is based in part on interviews conducted with Dr Omar Grech, Senior Lecturer in International Law at the University of Malta (UM); Dr Derek Lutterbeck, Deputy Director at the Mediterranean Academy of Diplomatic Studies at UM; and Dr Felicity Attard, expert in International and Maritime Security Law at the Faculty of Laws at UM. 

No comment yet, add your voice below!


Add a Comment